Major Findings & Recommendations
The authors “find that job search assistance programs are more likely to yield positive impacts, whereas public sector employment programs are less likely. Classroom and on-the-job training programs yield relatively positive impacts in the medium term, although in the short-term these programs often have insignificant or negative impacts. [The authors] also find that the outcome variable used to measure program impact matters in particular studies based on registered unemployment, are more likely to yield positive program impacts than those based on other outcomes (like employment or earnings). On the other hand, neither the publication status of a study nor the use of a randomized design is related to the sign or significance of the corresponding program estimate. Finally, [the authors] used a subset of studies that focus on post-program employment to compare meta-analytic models for the “effect size” of a program estimate with models for the sign and significance of the estimated program effect. {The authors] found that the two approaches lead to very similar conclusions about the determinants of program impact.” (p.2) (Abstractor: Author and Website Staff).