Brief program overview and preliminary findings from the random assignment study of the Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration and the Enhanced Transitional Jobs Demonstration.

“The Subsidized and Transitional Employment Demonstration (STED) and…the Enhanced Transitional Jobs Demonstration (ETJD) [are] complementary large-scale research projects evaluating the effectiveness of the latest generation of subsidized employment models. The ETJD and STED projects are evaluating a total of 13 subsidized employment programs in 10 locations across the United States, all of which aim to improve participants’ long-term success in the labor market. They target groups considered ’hard to employ’ (recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families [TANF], people with criminal records, young people who are neither in school nor working, and others), and they use subsidies to give participants opportunities to learn employment skills while working in supportive settings, or to help them get a foot in the door with employers…Each of the 13 program models is distinct, but it is possible to group them into three broad categories:

• Modified Transitional Jobs Models place all or nearly all participants into fully subsidized, temporary jobs designed to teach soft skills and provide work experience. There is no expectation that host employers will hire participants permanently.

• Wage Subsidy Models place participants directly into permanent positions. An employer receives a temporary subsidy covering all or part of an employee’s wages and, in return, is expected to move the individual into a regular, unsubsidized job if things go well.

• Hybrid Models use a combination of modified transitional jobs and wage subsidies.” (p.iii).

(Abstractor: Author)

Major Findings & Recommendations

“At this early stage, a few cross-cutting themes stand out: • Most programs struggled initially to meet their recruitment targets due to somewhat narrow eligibility criteria, selective screening protocols, inadequate referral partnerships, or a combination of these factors. Ultimately, the programs were able to meet their goals. • Programs were better able to place participants into fully subsidized, temporary jobs than into subsidized, permanent positions. • The policies and practices of the criminal justice, public assistance, and child support systems may affect the outcomes of both program and control group members” (p.iii). (Abstractor: Author).