Evaluation of the Maryland Unemployment Insurance Work Search Demonstration
Author(s): Klepinger, Daniel H.; Johnson, Terry R.; Joesch, Jutta M.; and Benus, Jacob M.
Organizational Author(s): Battelle Memorial Institute and Abt Associates Inc.
U.S. Department of Labor
Resource Availability: Publically available
Reports findings from a random assignment study that tested the effectiveness and efficiency of four different packages of services designed to reduce benefit receipt and improve employment outcomes among Unemployment Insurance claimants in Maryland, such as requiring a job search workshop or increasing the number of required employer contacts.
“The Maryland Unemployment Insurance (UI) Work Search Demonstration was designed to examine the effectiveness of alternative work search policies in the UI program. In Maryland, to be eligible to receive UI benefits at the time of the demonstration, claimants were required to search for work and to report two employer contacts made per week….There was no review or verification of the reported contacts with employers, and no specific job search assistance services were offered as part of the work search policy....
To provide…information on the relative effectiveness of alternative work search policies, the Maryland UI Work Search Demonstration tested four alternative packages…of work search and re-employment services: (1) increased work search requirements by requiring claimants to make a total of four employer contacts per week; (2) modified the policy by not requiring claimants to document the two specific employers contacted, but continued the requirement of two contacts per week; (3) supplemented the normal work search requirements with a requirement that claimants attend a 4-day job search workshop early in their unemployment spell; and (4) continued the normal work search requirements of two contacts per week but informed claimants that their contacts would be verified. In addition, the demonstration included two control groups…with both control groups required to follow the normal requirements of two employer contacts per week…but one of the groups was informed that they were part of a demonstration project and that their administrative records would be included in the evaluation of the study. To ensure reliable evaluation results, the demonstration project was implemented using a classical experimental design, with random assignment of new claimants to one of the six groups.
The work search demonstration project was implemented in six UI offices, selected to ensure geographical and local labor market representation, and so that the results could be generalized to the state as a whole. The demonstration project began in January 1994, and over 27,000 new claimants were randomly assigned to one of the treatment or control groups during the one-year enrollment period. The evaluation was designed to examine the impacts of the demonstration on key UI outcome measures (e.g., weeks and dollars of UI benefit payments) and employment measures (e.g., whether employed, earnings) to be measured using administrative data sources” (p.v).
Major Findings & Recommendations
“The results indicate that work search policies and re-employment services have important consequences for the UI Trust Fund that are widespread across various claimant sub-groups. First, [the authors] find that relative to the normal work search policy, increasing the number of required employer contacts from two to four reduces UI payments per claimant on average by 0.7 weeks and $116….Thus, increasing the number of required work search contacts from two to four is an effective approach to reducing UI payments.
[The authors] also find that the work search treatment of requiring claimants to make the normal two employer contacts per week, but informing them that the contacts will be verified, has statistically significant and similar impacts on the UI Trust Fund. Specifically, relative to the normal work search policy, the employer contact verification treatment reduces UI payments by 0.9 weeks and $113….
[The authors] also find that the impacts of both treatments occur early, during the initial spell of unemployment. Taken together, these results indicate that either increasing the number of required employer contacts or verification of employer contacts are effective approaches to reducing UI outlays.
In contrast, [the authors] find that the approach of informing claimants that they must search for work but that they do not have to report their work search contacts each week to continue receiving UI payments does not affect UI payments….
[The authors’] findings concerning re-employment services indicate that requiring claimants to attend a job search workshop early in their re-employment spell is also an effective approach to reducing UI outlays. Specifically, relative to the normal UI work search policy, claimants who were randomly assigned to participate in a 4-day job search workshop received 0.6 weeks fewer and $75 less UI payments on average….
Although [the] results indicate that the two more stringent work search policies and requiring claimants to participate in a job search workshop are effective in reducing the UI spell…[the authors] do not find that reducing the job search period occurs at the cost of lower earnings. That is, [the] results indicate that the earnings of the control group in the year after filing their UI claim are essentially similar to the earnings of the groups that were assigned to these other work search policies” (p.v-vi).
Workforce System Strategies Content Information
You Might Also Like
- Assisting Unemployment Insurance Claimants: The Long-Term Im...
- The Washington Reemployment Bonus Experiment Final Report
- Getting Real: Time to Re-Invest in the Public Employment Ser...
- Responses to Personal Reemployment Accounts (PRAs): Findings...
- Job Search Assistance Programs – A Review of the Literature