“[T]o increase the connectedness and capacity of the Manufacturing Advancement Pathways Project (MAPP) at four community and technical colleges in the Puget Sound region….MAPP partners, which include college and workforce development organizations, have met regularly…[to take] actions to align their resources, and increase their understanding of where and how the manufacturing career pathway could be strengthened to meet the current and emerging needs of employers….Each of the MAPP college partners (South Seattle College, Shoreline College, Renton Technical College, and Everett Community College) provided data about the role(s) of employers in their manufacturing career pathway work. As part of their next step capacity building efforts the MAPP partners decided to survey a subgroup of employers whom they felt could provide more in depth information. The balance of this report focuses on the survey purpose, methods, results and implications” (p.5).
“The purpose of the MAPP Employer Survey was to use information provided by manufacturing employers to strengthen the talent pipeline to high demand entry and mid- level manufacturing jobs. The employer survey respondents were identified by MAPP partners. Surveys garnered information about:
- Employer Hiring Needs, Sources and Priorities;
- Employer Perceptions of Community and Technical College Graduate Preparedness for Work;
- Employer Recommendations for Improving Student Preparedness
- Employer Feedback about Workforce Retention Obstacles, Advancement Requirements and Opportunities; and
- Employer Partnerships with Community and Technical colleges….
Sixty-six employers completed the 19 question on line survey tool. The majority (68%) of survey respondents were human services staff or managers. Another 18% identified themselves as recruiters. Examples of other respondent job titles included Company Owners, Talent Acquisition Managers, General Managers, Machining Specialists, Client Relations Managers, Senior Staff Analyst, Strategic Account Directors and Operations Managers. The number of employees in the 66 companies differed” (p.6).(Abstractor: Author)